Phone:
(701)814-6992
Physical address:
6296 Donnelly Plaza
Ratkeville, Bahamas.

For decades, screen printing has been the dominant method for garment decoration. It powered the growth of apparel factories, promotional printing businesses, and global merchandise brands. However, in recent years, DTF printing (Direct to Film printing) has emerged as a strong alternative—and in many cases, a replacement.
Business owners today face an important decision:
Should you continue investing in screen printing, or shift toward DTF printing?
The answer is not universal. Each technology serves different business models, order types, and growth strategies.
This article provides a practical, business-oriented comparison between DTF printing and screen printing, helping you determine which solution fits your operation now and in the future.
Screen printing is a traditional printing method that transfers ink onto fabric through a mesh screen. Each color in a design requires a separate screen, and ink is pushed through the stencil using a squeegee.
Screen printing has powered the apparel industry for decades and remains widely used in mass production environments.
DTF (Direct to Film) printing is a digital heat-transfer technology. Designs are printed onto PET film using CMYK + white ink, coated with hot-melt adhesive powder, cured, and then transferred onto fabric via heat press.
DTF is often described as a bridge between digital flexibility and industrial production.

Screen printing requires:
For businesses handling multiple designs or frequent changes, setup costs quickly accumulate.
DTF printing requires:
While the initial investment may appear similar, DTF eliminates per-design setup costs, making it far more efficient for dynamic production.
Winner: DTF printing for low to medium order variety
Screen printing remains highly efficient for:
Once setup is complete, per-unit cost is extremely low.
DTF excels in:
Screen printing becomes inefficient when frequent setup changes are required.
Winner: Depends on order structure
DTF enables complex, high-resolution designs without added production complexity.
Winner: DTF printing
DTF works on:
One workflow, multiple substrates.
Winner: DTF printing
Labor cost and training are significant factors.
DTF reduces dependency on highly specialized labor, which is critical in regions with rising labor costs.
Winner: DTF printing
Scaling screen printing requires:
DTF scales through:
DTF production lines can grow modularly, reducing operational risk.
Winner: DTF printing
While DTF requires technical maintenance, it is predictable and standardized, especially with proper after-sales support.
DTF aligns better with modern sustainability standards promoted by:
For businesses handling mixed order structures, DTF often delivers higher long-term profitability.
False. Screen printing remains effective for specific use cases.
Also false. It remains efficient for mass production.
The future belongs to hybrid production models that leverage both technologies.
According to FESPA (https://www.fespa.com), digital textile printing—including DTF—continues to grow faster than traditional methods due to customization demand.
DTF is not replacing screen printing; it is reshaping how businesses approach production flexibility.
Choose screen printing if:
Choose DTF printing if:
For many businesses, the optimal solution is DTF + screen printing working together, each used where it performs best.



